3 ms·
Not terrible, but not good enough for most uses.
by Tams80 5y ago
Not terrible, but not good enough for most uses.
- andybak 5y agoWhat "uses" are you thinking of? It's not going to replace industrial laser scanners for surveying and site inspection but it's good enough for many of things we're currently using photogrammetry for. And the sheer ease of use could open up new applications that wouldn't have been viable with slower workflows. Speed is a feature in it's own right.