4 ms·
>So now it's just OK to seize private property of individuals without any even pretend due process? Who said there's no due process? That's why it's getting se
by CTDOCodebases 5y ago
>So now it's just OK to seize private property of individuals without any even pretend due process?
Who said there's no due process? That's why it's getting seized. Forfeiture happens later if it's proven laws have been broken.
Besides, seizing property is better than more violence. Maybe if the Taliban seized the assets of rich american elites America would have left Afghanistan a lot sooner.
>Our response to this is getting pretty fucking scary.
I'm watching people lose all their private property or worse while the aggressor responsible for the situation threatens “consequences greater than any you have faced in history” to any nation who wishes to step in and stop this. Pretty scary huh?
>We need to start dialing this back or we become what we're supposedly against.
So no military intervention and sanctions. How is this supposed to end? I don't think apathy will do it.
- ilammy 5y ago> Besides, seizing property is better than more violence. Also, governments can un-seize property back after a while. It's not like this stuff gets immediately liquidated and funneled into defense spending or disaster relief or whatever.