3 ms·
Yeah, I'm going to assume the technology change was not what improved things, but the engineers who were working on the problem. At the end of the day, People
by spydum 15y ago
Yeah, I'm going to assume the technology change was not what improved things, but the engineers who were working on the problem.
At the end of the day, People solve problems, not technology. Someone with sufficient skill could probably rewrite the lions share of the environment in Perl, had they been given the task and enough resources.
It's all about your engineers, and the resources you give them!
- cbs 15y ago>Yeah, I'm going to assume the technology change was not what improved things, but the engineers who were working on the problem. I agree, this sounded like a technical solution to a social problem. The real issue sounded like the disconnect between the application folks and the db folks. If trashing one decent architecture for another was the catalyst they needed to bring around development culture change, it was a good move, but it hardly sounds like they had a technology problem.