What I took away from this article is that the author(s) don't seem to have a feedback cycle outside their bubble. Hopefully the discussion here might help a b

What I took away from this article is that the author(s) don't seem to have a feedback cycle outside their bubble. Hopefully the discussion here might help a bit. I read a lot of valid criticism here that should (in best case) already have been incorporated into the thinking process while researching the idea of a 'Market Rank'. > An object with a higher market value is probably better That was the moment the article lost me personally.