3 ms·

There is no legally required disclosure anywhere about this being a paid endorsement, so we'll have to imagine that Mozilla engineers have spent their time on w

• Cpoll 5y ago
  Is disclosure legally required? If something can be understood to be an ad instead of a testimonial or endorsement, I imagined disclosure wasn't required in any jurisdiction. Regardless, there's precedent for "we'll have to imagine that Mozilla engineers have spent their time on working to promote a Disney movie just because it's cool and it is available on Disney+." > Mozilla wasn't paid for the "Mr. Robot" tie-in, [Mozilla's chief marketing officer] Kaykas-Wolff said. "We've enjoyed a growing partnership with the show and the show's audience," he said. https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/mozilla-backpedals-after-mr-robot-firefox-misstep/ https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/mozilla-backpedals-after-m...