3 ms·
> high-overhead You understand that all the things done in Java and .NET’s “enterprisy” way can be done is most languages right? This is a programmer problem
by metaltyphoon 5y ago
> high-overhead
You understand that all the things done in Java and .NET’s “enterprisy” way can be done is most languages right?
This is a programmer problem not a programming language one. Today you have to write less in C# than GoLang, to do the same tasks. Does that mean GoLang is enterprisey now, just because you have to write more?
- ncmncm 5y agoNot "just because". Go is exactly as enterprisey as Java and C#, and for exactly all the same reasons. And, it is not a programmer problem. It is a management problem. None of them would exist without management demand for minimally-productive languages.
- metaltyphoon 5y agoWhat a weird hill to die on. I have a hard time believing “management” woke up one day and said: “how can we make the most minimally productive language”. Tell me about this secret non “enterprisey” stack you are using.
- ncmncm 5y agoManagement does not make languages. They use what exists that satisfies their need for large head count. Sun and Microsoft were happy to provide it for them.
- metaltyphoon 5y agoAgain tell me what you think is not enterprisey then. I would like to open my mind to it.