IMVHO People should reason about https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/ https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/ and about the fac

IMVHO People should reason about https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/ https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/ and about the fact that we work to live, not live to work. From that the target is neither WFO or WFO but work less to still have more. In that sense we should/must tend to what makes us feel better. If WFH works for that than we should go for it, if not we should not. The world is not that big, but also not that little, there is room for diversity, not only: diversity is the engine of evolution, we do things differently and compare the outcome in a constantly improving manner, a thing all dictator hate because let people see different worlds instead of "there is no alternative", "we are in the sole and unique possible system" etc but the real engine of human evolution. That means it's about time to change the society, and yes that's not easy, that's might provoke big disasters and suffering before arrive to a new stability but that's is. There is nothing "fully right" and nothing "fully wrong", there is almost never "the best solution" to anything, we need to try, fail, correct, keep evolving.