3 ms·
> the remote people find that they routinely hear about things much later than everyone in the office knows about them. I'm not sure this tracks with my experi
by karaterobot 5y ago
> the remote people find that they routinely hear about things much later than everyone in the office knows about them.
I'm not sure this tracks with my experience. It seems like the organizational structure of a company is what keeps people from learning about things, not their location. The common case I can think of is that some meeting occurs in which a decision is made, and that decision and the context around it are not communicated outside the meeting (in a timely or efficient way, that is).
Some people are "in the know" and others are not, but it's a function of who they work with, not who they meet in the hallway.
If you mean gossip, watercooler chat, that kind of thing, sure. But, I don't miss that stuff.
Maybe you're thinking of some other example that I'm not.
- stormbrew 5y agoDecisions get made at the water cooler, at lunch, in meetings where no one is taking notes, when one person stops by another person's desk... In person there are many opportunities for this information to spread by grapevine, because you actively see what other people are doing and you can ask. Being remote often means you have more unknown unknowns, because you can't see the daily goings-on. If you haven't experienced this, you're either very lucky or your company is a lot more remote-centric than you think it is.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]