3 ms·
they should insist his site be taken down, under his own policy any other site would have been for the initial infringement, irrelevant of the later change.
by etherealG 15y ago
they should insist his site be taken down, under his own policy any other site would have been for the initial infringement, irrelevant of the later change.
- codeup 15y agoOf course this would be an obvious demand and ironic. But I suggest one should only insist that he retreats from his policy aims: accept failure and/or step down. Asking for his site to be taken down in accordance with his own misguided policy could give undue legitimacy to this policy.
- dlikhten 15y agoI second this. Can he also be ostracized from the internet completely on all devices/all his locations? In fact hit his office staff too since we are not sure who actually committed the infringement.