4 ms·
Looks identical and is identical are two different concerns though. I bought a (used) dryer from a small appliance vendor that looked identical to the new one r
by tpmoney 5y ago
Looks identical and is identical are two different concerns though. I bought a (used) dryer from a small appliance vendor that looked identical to the new one right next to it for half as much. It was only a year later when it stopped working and I opened it up that I discovered where a thermal fuse should be there was just a straight piece of non high temp wire that had melted and thankfully not burned my house down when it failed. Which isn't to say that first party parts may not be marked up for profit, just that external looks of things don't tell you anything about the actual internal construction.
- newaccount74 5y agoI agree with your point in general. I have bought spare parts from sketchy websites in the past and sometimes they are not as good as the original. You can usually tell the difference if you look at them closely. But heating elements are very simple parts, and I bought it from a reputable local store, so I don't really worry that I'm getting an unsafe part. It's probably going to fail in a few years due to corrosion just like the original part (we have very hard water), and then I'll swap it again.
- iso1631 5y agoHeating Element sounds just the trick to start a fire
- R0b0t1 5y agoIt's typical to have a markup goal of at least 10x going from place of origin to destination market. It is a scam. Source: involved in electronic design and manufacture.
- robertlagrant 5y agoIt's not a scam - they just don't particularly want to be in the business of supplying parts, so they charge a premium. You can buy an alternative if you like.
- R0b0t1 5y agoNot markup on the parts. The whole product you are initially sold.
- robertlagrant 5y agoThe conversation is about the disparity in pricing between parts as spares and parts assembled into the original product.
- goodpoint 5y agoDifferences beyond 2x are still a clear indication that official replacement parts are a scam. Also, the costs were not so absurdly high 20, 40 or 60 years ago!
- pc86 5y agoMaking a profit, even a large one, is not in and of itself a scam.
- goodpoint 5y agoNice strawman there.
- pc86 5y ago> Differences beyond 2x are still a clear indication that official replacement parts are a scam. How are you not saying that they're making too much money and it's therefore "a clear indication" that it's a scam? I'd love to be told why I'm wrong rather than just "hurr durr strawman"
- goodpoint 5y agoRead my message again and read your reply again then. Selling replacement parts with an unreasonable markup is a form of bait and switch: the customer buys the product thinking that it will have a given TCO over its lifetime. Only after some time the customer learns that the TCO is much higher when a replacement is needed. You twisted my words by claiming that making a profit is not a scam.
- CRConrad 5y agoAFAICS making a profit without providing an equitably commensurate value in return, as consideration for the payment the profit comes from, is the very definition of a scam.
- pc86 5y ago
- VonGallifrey 5y ago> straight piece of non high temp wire that had melted I am not sure if that is what you mean, but to me it sounds like they might have purposefully put there so that it works like a thermal fuse.
- littlestymaar 5y agoThis was responding to a comment saying that the cost was justified by logistics issues even if the part itself was dirt cheap. The fact that you can in fact find way cheaper parts shows that the logistic argument is BS.