3 ms·
Could we at least make this comparison in good faith? Apple is not a company that "makes disposable earphones". AirPods are a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of its
by Bud 5y ago
Could we at least make this comparison in good faith?
Apple is not a company that "makes disposable earphones". AirPods are a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of its business. The vast majority of its products can easily last a decade or more and are recyclable after that.
Saying that Apple is worth trillions because of a side product like AirPods is ludicrous. Make your argument without this sloppy, inaccurate Apple-blaming.
- robin_reala 5y agoYou can look at the figures. Their most recent earnings statement[1] has “wearables, home and accessories” at 11.9% of their revenue. We don’t know how much of that is AirPods but I’d be surprised if it’s less that 50% given Watch and HomePod sales. [1] https://www.apple.com/newsroom/pdfs/FY22_Q1_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf https://www.apple.com/newsroom/pdfs/FY22_Q1_Consolidated_Fin...
- syshum 5y ago> "and are recyclable after that." Ohh come on... Apple requires them to be shredded, after which some of the base metals can be recovered but there is still a ton of waste in that. > products can easily last a decade As long as you are fine with them reducing your battery life to get you to upgrade. Apple, and the carriers have lots of incentive programs design to get people to "upgrade" the phones and when using those programs those phones go strait to recycle (i.e shredder) Recycle is the LAST RESORT for sustainability, remember the triad is "REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE" Apple only even plays lip service to the Recycle part, and want to prevent the Reduce and Reuse part by preventing / disincentivizing repair and resell.