4 ms·
> but didn’t produce anything that truly raised the economy… that’s the point. Utterly false. They produced people taking way more rides. More rides = more peo
by whitepaint 5y ago
> but didn’t produce anything that truly raised the economy… that’s the point.
Utterly false. They produced people taking way more rides. More rides = more people going out to different places.
- Beltalowda 5y agoIt's not like people would be stuck in the house otherwise. It's just that people would have taken public transport, their own car, or went by foot or bicycle before. I'm very skeptical of this claim that Uber increased mobility.
- spacebanana7 5y agoIt’s hard to get empirical evidence for the general claim that Uber increased mobility after adjusting for substitution effects from walking etc. However, I think one can make the case from economic intuition that price reductions generally increase consumption in a category of normal goods. E.g - a reduction in the price of wheat will increase food consumption even after accounting for people switching from other crops. Conversely, an increase in the price of Lego will reduce the amount of toys the average child gets, even after adjusting for the substitution to action figure etc.