3 ms·
>Because it's not an argument against the action Indeed, it is not per se. >it's a complaint about the lack of other actions No, it is not per se. It is a me
by LudwigNagasena 5y ago
>Because it's not an argument against the action
Indeed, it is not per se.
>it's a complaint about the lack of other actions
No, it is not per se. It is a meta-level argument on inconsistency.
>The poster has not presented an argument as to why the sanctions are not a good response, or won't have the intended response, instead they have posted a list of other injustices to which we did not implement sanctions or otherwise take action.
Yes, there is nothing fallacious about that.
- avereveard 5y ago> meta-level argument on inconsistency If you think that a regional scale conflict and a country yelling nuclear annihilation at every turn are at the same level and needs the same, consistent, response you have no place discussing meta arguments.
- LudwigNagasena 5y agoThe fact is that there is no fallacy. Whether the comparison is warranted is a whole nother issue. There is no reason to gish-gallop.