7 ms·
Funny how differently the grandparent's anecdotic but positive comment and this anecdotic but negative comment are treated.
by johncoltrane 5y ago
Funny how differently the grandparent's anecdotic but positive comment and this anecdotic but negative comment are treated.
- thawaya3113 5y agoFor one thing, the negative comment appears to be claiming that the backend being more complex than the front end is a very strong indicator that the backend tooling was worse, and that in a web project, everything else equal, the front end should always take longer than the back end. The entire premise is dubious, and even if the premise is correct, blaming it on the framework without any other evidence seems like a stretch.
- jwdunne 5y agoAye, I noticed this too and I’ve never written a line of production C# in my life. On the projects I’ve worked on recently, the backend often ended up far more complex than the frontend, taking up more time to build and maintain. This is natural. The backends were responsible for interfacing with other systems, like databases, 3rd party APIs and message queues, for example. The frontends, on the other hand, generally interfaced with only one system: the backend. Am I arguing that the frontend is never more complex and time consuming than the backend? Not at all. But I don’t think you can blame the backend stack and tooling for the resultant imbalance of complexity between the two systems.
- manigandham 5y agoBecause the issues described downstream are bordering on ridiculous and betray lack of knowledge of how to use the ecosystem rather than a problem with the stack itself.