4 ms·
Does a reasonable person still have an expectation of privacy if not only does he leave the door open, he sits by while a supposed intruder walks in and out not
by corey_moncure 5y ago
Does a reasonable person still have an expectation of privacy if not only does he leave the door open, he sits by while a supposed intruder walks in and out not once, not twice, but one hundred thousand times (in addition to unknown numbers of other intruders multiplied by unknown numbers of more times)? Not only was the organization so derelict in their affairs that they failed to protect sensitive customer data, they didn't even notice the "crime" had taken place (a hundred thousand times), and in fact, would never have noticed, and would prefer not to have noticed, had they not been forced by the threat of public disclosure.
- rosndo 5y agoNobody is sitting by these servers, looking at packets as they pass by. > Not only was the organization so derelict in their affairs that they failed to protect sensitive customer data, they didn't even notice the "crime" had taken place None of this would reduce the intruders liability. Perhaps the company should be tried separately for their failure to protect customer data, but that’s a different issue.