> knowingly Was it alleged that judyrecords had mens rea? https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mens_rea https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mens_rea The [Model Penal

> knowingly Was it alleged that judyrecords had mens rea? https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mens_rea https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mens_rea The [Model Penal Code (MPC)] and Mens Rea Most states use the MPC's classification for various mentes reae. The MPC organizes and defines culpable states of mind into four hierarchical categories: 1. acting purposely - the defendant had an underlying conscious object to act 2. acting knowingly - the defendant is practically certain that the conduct will cause a particular result 3. acting recklessly - The defendant consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustified risk 4. acting negligently - The defendant was not aware of the risk, but should have been aware of the risk Thus, a crime committed purposefully would carry a more severe punishment than if the offender acted knowingly, recklessly, or negligently. The MPC greatly impacted the criminal codes of a number of states and continues to be influential in furthering discourse on mens rea. Some have expanded the MPC classification to include a fifth state of mind: "strict liability." Strict liability crimes do not require a guilty state of mind.