3 ms·

That is true, but the court also expressed skepticism on the CFAA interpretation- but since the jurisdiction was wrong, they didn't need to make a ruling on the

That is true, but the court also expressed skepticism on the CFAA interpretation- but since the jurisdiction was wrong, they didn't need to make a ruling on the CFAA. I am unaware of any case going to trial using that interpretation of the CFAA since, though.

rosndo 5y ago
> I am unaware of any case going to trial using that interpretation of the CFAA since Which interpretation would that be? That unauthorized access is illegal?
- Talanes 5y ago
  That making a server request and having that server request answered counts as unauthorized access.
  - rosndo 5y ago
    That’s been litigated over and over again. Some requests, performed with malicious intent, do in fact count as unauthorized access.