4 ms·

See this nuclear positive website that doesn't have an imprint (I can find on mobile). I wouldn't bcall it research either. Summary would probably be fair.

fsflover 5y ago
It contains links to the research.
- Krasnol 5y ago
  Yeah but only where it fits the narrative which in the question of cost for example leads to this: 1) If markets valued the low-CO2 nature of nuclear, they’d be doing better 2) Multiple hypothetical approaches to reduce nuclear costs are ongoing. No one knows for sure if any of them will work, or which one will work best 3) Factory-produced large reactors on floating platforms is a surprisingly intriguing idea to make reactors cheap or: 1) make everything else more expensive so we look better 2) let me consult the magic orb because I have nothing in my hands 3) I have a nice idea Meanwhile we have HERE just another example of hilariously expensive reactor. Actual facts. Waved away with theories like "we don't have the people with experience anymore" which leaves you with the thought: should inexperienced people build nuclear reactors at all?
CRConrad 5y ago
> See this nuclear positive website that doesn't have an imprint You mean an "Impressum"? That's just some weird thing that AFAIK (almost?) only German Web sites have, because they're required to by German law. The vast majority of sites on the World Wide Web get by just fine without it; it's not like that's some kind of minimum requirement for a reputable site.
- freemint 5y ago
  I want to see who is behind an advocacy group. If it is a letterbox address and if so what other letter boxes are at this address.
  - CRConrad 5y ago
    Many, probably most, Web sites the world over have "About Us" or "Contact" pages. It's just that they're not universally called "Impressum" ("Imprint"); that's a Germany-only thing. So saying "a Web site without an imprint" as if that in itself somehow showed the site were somehow bad is, if it's about a non-German site, just stupid. HTH.

fsflover 5y ago

It contains links to the research.

Krasnol 5y ago
Yeah but only where it fits the narrative which in the question of cost for example leads to this: 1) If markets valued the low-CO2 nature of nuclear, they’d be doing better 2) Multiple hypothetical approaches to reduce nuclear costs are ongoing. No one knows for sure if any of them will work, or which one will work best 3) Factory-produced large reactors on floating platforms is a surprisingly intriguing idea to make reactors cheap or: 1) make everything else more expensive so we look better 2) let me consult the magic orb because I have nothing in my hands 3) I have a nice idea Meanwhile we have HERE just another example of hilariously expensive reactor. Actual facts. Waved away with theories like "we don't have the people with experience anymore" which leaves you with the thought: should inexperienced people build nuclear reactors at all?

CRConrad 5y ago

> See this nuclear positive website that doesn't have an imprint You mean an "Impressum"? That's just some weird thing that AFAIK (almost?) only German Web sites have, because they're required to by German law. The vast majority of sites on the World Wide Web get by just fine without it; it's not like that's some kind of minimum requirement for a reputable site.

freemint 5y ago
I want to see who is behind an advocacy group. If it is a letterbox address and if so what other letter boxes are at this address.
- CRConrad 5y ago
  Many, probably most, Web sites the world over have "About Us" or "Contact" pages. It's just that they're not universally called "Impressum" ("Imprint"); that's a Germany-only thing. So saying "a Web site without an imprint" as if that in itself somehow showed the site were somehow bad is, if it's about a non-German site, just stupid. HTH.