4 ms·
Yup. Energy independence is a cost that’s not factored in. (Then again, solar/wind could serve both factors well)
by 8ytecoder 5y ago
Yup. Energy independence is a cost that’s not factored in. (Then again, solar/wind could serve both factors well)
- yakubin 5y ago> solar/wind could serve both factors well Not 24/7.
- hackerfromthefu 5y agoSure, but let's build 150% of total needed capacity as renewables, and burn coal for the 5 days a year we still need to.
- realusername 5y agoYou start to understand the issue of comparing the raw cost of kWh of renewables to stable energy like nuclear, if you have to build N times the capacity, the cost per kWh is just N times more expensive.
- afterburner 5y agoBut unlike nuclear, solar/wind is constantly getting cheaper. Nuclear is, frankly, doing the opposite.
- realusername 5y agoDoesn't matter if you can't build a grid with only those and still need gas or nuclear aside. The real cost of renewable in a functioning grid is probably 5 times higher of what's advertised when including externalities.
- lazide 5y agoWhen you do the 2-3x (minimum) for wind and solar + keep the coal plant around and ready to go at a moments notice, including stockpile fuel and maintain it, it starts getting really expensive really fast.
- ncmncm 5y agoGas plant. Coal is much more expensive than gas, by every measure, and is much less adjustable to immediate requirement. The only reason any coal is still being used is installed base and market and political inertia. Political, because it should already be banned.
- threeseed 5y agoIf you store it then it can be 24/7.
- CRConrad 5y agoSure. And if the Moon were made of green cheese and we had regular transport from a mining operation there we could all eat as much green cheese as we want.
- thfuran 5y agoWhere are the uranium mines?
- mantas 5y agoA single shipment from wherever can last a looooong time. It's not like gas or oil where you need continuous supply. And there're deposits in civilised world.
- hackerfromthefu 5y agoI think Australia has plenty. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/australia.aspx https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-pr...
- justatdotin 5y agonot many left operating. still cleaning up mess at ranger (which has impacted on a dual-listed world heritage national park) and rum jungle (there's a class action of the few surviving workers + their families whose cohort have suffered cancers) notably still operating is olympic dam, where the huge volumes of radioactive tailings literally spill out on the surrounding land, representing an entirely unmanaged environmental hazard. uranium mining is unclean unsafe and unwanted
- RobertMiller 5y agoKazakhstan (under Russia's sphere of influence) is the largest producer at 36% of the global supply (5% from Russia itself.) It can be purchased from countries like Canada (15%) or Australia (12%). The next two are Namibia and Niger, each producing 8% of the global supply.
- lazide 5y agoThe US also has very large stocks on states like Utah and Arizona. Generally hasn’t been considered economically worthwhile since WW2 however.
- burmanm 5y agoSolar is not a viable solution in the north. The energy usage goes up when solar generation goes down. For wind, we're too small country - there are always days without any wind. There are even days without any wind in nearby countries included.