3 ms·
I feel the same with Wikipedia, the Norwegian articles are often better than the English ones because they often are shorter and to the point. I don’t want to
by punnerud 5y ago
I feel the same with Wikipedia, the Norwegian articles are often better than the English ones because they often are shorter and to the point.
I don’t want to read 2000 words for something that could be explained in under 100.
Have been thinking of a 200word limit per article version of Wikipedia.
- Ardon 5y agoI'm not sure that's really in the spirit of an encyclopedia, unless you really could get all the information you had in those 200 words. I think this would be a valid imposition on the summary sections of most pages though, they can be a little unfocused I find.
- punnerud 5y agoYou get to put all the information there, but have to place it in a sub-article. That way you force the writer to have a more faster introduction.
- Hendrikto 5y ago> Have been thinking of a 200word limit per article version of Wikipedia. Hard limits are not a good solution either. They may still be better than the status quo though.