3 ms·
As far as I can see, there isn't a single waste incident anywhere in that list. It kind of looks like you googled for something, didn't read it, and started ar
by JohnHaugeland 5y ago
As far as I can see, there isn't a single waste incident anywhere in that list.
It kind of looks like you googled for something, didn't read it, and started arguing.
Looks like the only thing even mentioned there is that in the 1950s, there was an incident, and someone who isn't a doctor made an estimate that some cancer deaths might have happened later. Amusingly, it's the same person who predicted 20 million deaths from Chernobyl, and still insists they happened and are being covered up.
Can you tell me which specific disagreement you see there? I'd like to think you're not listening to the guy who says there were three secret holocausts worth of death in the 1990s.
- ozim 5y agoI agree, list does not indicate anything about waste unless it is "metal waste".
- JohnHaugeland 5y agoTypical anti-nuke: pretends they've found contrary evidence, hasn't Three different people in this thread told me to ignore the physicists, the history, and the real world evidence, and to pretend that what we were waiting on was the half-life of uranium It's really embarrassing that HN isn't able to reject these things successfully. This is anti-vax level thinking