I can't tell if the author is pretending that Kant was never born for the sake of popularization, or if this limit is representative of philosophy of science at

I can't tell if the author is pretending that Kant was never born for the sake of popularization, or if this limit is representative of philosophy of science at large. But this speaks volumes: > The philosopher’s aim is not to help scientists do their job. Instead, the philosopher’s aim is to better understand the job that scientists are doing. What a moribund endeavor. Is there no one left with the ambition of Althusser?