3 ms·
> I don't think arguing this is a "western" invention is very convincing or useful. Any ancient army or polity of any size would have had an equivalent, which w
by qeternity 5y ago
> I don't think arguing this is a "western" invention is very convincing or useful. Any ancient army or polity of any size would have had an equivalent, which would then include ancient Egypt, China[2], India, Mesopotamia[3], Mesoamerica, etc.
And yet, none of these other regions and cultures actually did invent it, and thus it remains a Western invention.
- contingencies 5y agoOf course. However, my point was the originality and claim to authorship is low, because if you look at store and forward networks with centrally agreed node identification and local caching using that for routing purposes, humans have literally done it globally for 3000+ years... that's clear prior art. It's like "technology" being used to describe a bash script, or "invention" used to describe a standard algorithm.
- kfrzcode 5y agohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc883#page-72 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc883#page-72