4 ms·
POTUS warns Russia will pay 'a severe price' if Chemical-Weapons used in Ukraine
- clouddrover 5y ago> Russia will pay a severe price if they use chemicals Irrelevant. There is already war. The time for imposing severe prices is now. There is no longer any point in holding penalties in reserve. If there are penalties to apply then apply them.
- moltke 5y agoThat's how you know there aren't any real penalties to apply left.
- 2Gkashmiri 5y agoagent orange anyone? why didn't anyone penalize the US for dropping hiroshima bombs, or for agent orange in vietnam or nuclear tactical weapons in afghanistan https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2012/04/09/usa-have-used-tactical-nuclear-weapons-afghanistan-iraq/ https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2012/04/09/usa-have-u...
- eesmith 5y agoYour citation also claims 9/11 was caused by "small yield thermonuclear explosions" and provides no citation for 'Peter Eyre, a Middle East consultant, said the US used tactical nuclear weapons at least once in Iraq and a few times in Afghanistan, in Bora Bora mountains', much less evidence.
- 2Gkashmiri 5y agoare you being dumb? i searched for "afghanistan" + "nuclear weapons"+ "usa". this is one of the links that showed up. this particular link is just an example, you can do your own research if you like. i remember watching news of how there is increase in birth defects in those kids from afghanistan/iraq because USA is using some sort of nuclear weapons. i couldn;t find the link to that so i found the next thing. my point is, USA gets a free pass to do the same things it accuses others of "dont you dare uses nuclear weapons" when its the only country in the first place who has used nuclear weapons in a war. no country sanctioned the US for that, or its continued support for the apartheid state of israel or even the saudi destruction of yemen. "stategic partners" as they are called. they get to enjoy protection of the big dick swingers. what i am trying to say is, why should USA interfere with a war between russia and ukraine? why? why do american companies do hypocrisy when they claim "free speech" when it comes to russia banning western media/SM but US companies are quick to cut off russia from their networks like the plague "in the interest of humanity" and yet when it comes to iran, "well we cannot fight sanctions, can we" so when its iran its "if we continue serving then, US govt will sanction us so we will not transact with them", when its russia "we will preemptively ban russian users in protest" and at the same time when russia bans them (news or fb/ mastercard/visa) "oh, attack on free speech. people in oppressed countries need to see the world media" and other BS. drop the nonsense will you and go back to your Mcdonalds.
- eesmith 5y agoDepleted uranium rounds are no more a nuclear weapon than aluminum. If you want to make a serious argument, do a better job of understanding your citations. And when we butchered your sons, boys When we butchered your sons Have a stick of our gum, boys Have a stick of our bubblegum We own half the world, oh say can you see? And the name for our profits is democracy So like it or not, you will have to be free 'Cause we're the cops of the world, boys We're the cops of the world