3 ms·
Without commenting on the situation or the topic, it's strange how close-minded and terrified of different opinions or ideas people are to this topic. There's a
by throwawaylinux 5y ago
Without commenting on the situation or the topic, it's strange how close-minded and terrified of different opinions or ideas people are to this topic. There's a rabid, hateful, jingoistic "you're either with us or you're a traitor" fervor. It's amazing how strongly people are influenced by the popular narrative, the media, politicians. I seem to remember it was like this in the lead up to the last Iraq war too. Freedom fries, and USA chants, and denunciation of traitors everywhere.
Funny thing is a lot of the current hate I see coming from people who would ordinarily be the first in line to blame the west for any and all suffering, conflict, wars, and injustice around the world. Digging as far back to the crusades and the Roman Empire if necessary.
Yet I've never seen alternate views like this highly upvoted or discussed rationally on sites like this or reddit, despite swaths of newly minted Russia/Ukraine experts who one would have thought would be thirsty for new reading and debate on the subject.
- esperent 5y ago> Yet I've never seen alternate views like this highly upvoted or discussed rationally on sites like this or reddit Two reasons why this won't get upvoted that have nothing to do with what you said: 1. Article is behind a paywall 2. It's a shallow and uninteresting take
- throwawaylinux 5y agoI've never seen any slightly contrary opinion upvoted at all, so any depth would be better than none. But "Putin = Hitler" is the shallowest and most boring take there is, and those are upvoted ad nauseam by the intelligentsia. So depth certainly does not correlate with popularity. Paywalls maybe. I've seen lots of paywalled articles on the front page too though so I'm also skeptical about that explaining it.