4 ms·
Because a car in America is fairly essential for upward mobility and that tax hits the poorest the hardest making it harder to keep that car. It's effectively
by Enginerrrd 5y ago
Because a car in America is fairly essential for upward mobility and that tax hits the poorest the hardest making it harder to keep that car. It's effectively rent-seeking for a low-level good without taking into account usage. They can't scale back usage to reduce that tax. It just is.
Compare it to similar rent-seeking taxes on land ownership (i.e. property taxes), which affect wealthier people more able to afford the tax.
I know when I was a college student, affording the registration and bare-bone insurance payments on my 25 year old honda was actually pretty non-trivial. If I couldn't afford gas on a particular month, I could find creative ways to ride-share / take public transit (sometimes) / not drive / etc. But that didn't do ANYTHING to my registration payment.
- nicoburns 5y ago> Because a car in America is fairly essential for upward mobility Really it's this that ought to be changed. Although I realise that's a much bigger task.
- Enginerrrd 5y agoYeah... The rise of remote work may help that situation. But as a whole, the solutions are probably borderline infeasible since the US is just so spread out.
- IgorPartola 5y agoSure. Go ahead and get your land mass compressor out. North America is huge and spread out.
- nicoburns 5y agoYou don't need to compress the land mass, just the people within it.