3 ms·
I had to check pricing after reading your comment. $375/year! That sounds crazy.
by notyourwork 5y ago
I had to check pricing after reading your comment. $375/year! That sounds crazy.
- jfk13 5y agoDoes a dollar a day sound more affordable? Just read the news over a cup of home-brewed coffee instead of getting a take-out, and you should easily break even. :)
- dangrossman 5y agoIf I'm going out to get my avocado toast anyway, it only makes sense to get the coffee with it since I'm right there. Maybe they should let me round up my change to get the day's FT news with my coffee at Starbucks instead.
- malloryerik 5y agoNot an entirely bad idea.
- notyourwork 5y agoFor me, no it doesn't.
- 8ytecoder 5y agoThey regularly have some deals going around. ft.com/weekendpodcast would also show you some deals. I pay around $80 a quarter. Like OP, worth every penny and it’s much more than just a financial newspaper. I get WSJ through work and NYT/WaPo are all super cheap. I’ve just never found the quality of FT. So I decided to pay for it. Another publication I recommend is The Economist.
- agumonkey 5y agoyeah it sure is not a lot.. we waste that without thinking usually
- ghaff 5y agoNew York Times is around $200. The Economist is something north of $100. So the FT is on the high side but hardly out of the ballpark.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- melony 5y agoThat's cheap compared to the Bloomberg terminal. High quality news is not free (news is not necessarily the same as journalism).
- cellis 5y agoBloomberg is even more at $415, and that's just the baby bloomberg! I pay for it and think it's worth it too.