3 ms·
Excuse me, I should have said that I was responding to your recording of synchronicities, not those other things. You seem to decide what to notice in an ad-ho
by sacrosancty 5y ago
Excuse me, I should have said that I was responding to your recording of synchronicities, not those other things.
You seem to decide what to notice in an ad-hoc way which means you'll be heavily influenced by what you want to notice. If you had made a hypothesis after wearing a bowtie, that you would see a bowtie wearing person on TV when coming home, then you would also have noticed the times when there was no synchronicity and could isolate your personal sensitivity to it from its actual occurrence. As it is, I don't think you can make any conclusions about nature from that record and the 5-day cycle might be nothing more than your fluctuating interest in finding them.