6 ms·
This is from 1999 and should not be recommended today, as C++11 was such a huge improvement over C++98/C++03.
by not2b 5y ago
This is from 1999 and should not be recommended today, as C++11 was such a huge improvement over C++98/C++03.
- Jtsummers 5y agoSome of the specifics, sure, but the premise is still sound: Teach C++ as Standard C++, not C in disguise, or C(++). It would certainly have cleaned up a lot of my former colleagues' code if that had been the case for them (to their credit, many of them also inherited the C(++) code and didn't just make from-scratch C(++) code, but they also didn't take too much time to fix it).
- einpoklum 5y agoThe specific examples in Bjarne presents aren't affected that much by C++11. But generally you're right, in that one should rely on 1999 materials for learning C++11 - nor 2011 materials for learning C++20 :-)