4 ms·
I find it fascinating that there is so much hand-wringing in the library world about challenges to books that a small part of the public finds offensive. Claims
by stolenmerch 5y ago
I find it fascinating that there is so much hand-wringing in the library world about challenges to books that a small part of the public finds offensive. Claims of obscenity, etc. that libraries then celebrate during Banned Books Week. Yet, this site shows just how willing librarians are to throw out books they personally find offensive. They are in charge of the collections, I get it, and it's not that big of a deal, but it's an interesting tension. Part of me wishes librarians would be just a bit more neutral in proclaiming what is definitively offensive or not.
For example, this is from the entry for the 1957 book "Rocket Power and Space Flight".
"The author talks to the “fellows” who wrote him letters and uses the pronoun “he” and “him” throughout the book. Reason #1 to weed it."
Sure, this is an old book and would probably get weeded anyway. But why make such a big deal about community members objecting to material when you yourself object to so much material?
- brimble 5y ago> "The author talks to the “fellows” who wrote him letters and uses the pronoun “he” and “him” throughout the book. Reason #1 to weed it." JFC. This was taught as standard usage until very recently. It's silly to fault a book published before, I dunno, 2010 or so if I'm being generous, for that.
- leephillips 5y agoI would expect an actual librarian to be endowed with a less shallow ability to judge the worth of books more than a few years old. I used to find this website entertaining, but this is quite disappointing.
- lupire 5y agoThis web site is one jerk and some friends, not "librarians" as a whole. Like other groups of humans, librarians have diverse opinions.