5 ms·
I know this isn't quite what your asking for, but one idea is to set up a Pi-hole + unbound: https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/ https://docs.pi-hole.n
by nfriedly 5y ago
I know this isn't quite what your asking for, but one idea is to set up a Pi-hole + unbound: https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/ https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/
Unbound is basically your own private DNS resolver and then Pi-hole lets you filter out whatever "junk" you don't want.
- drexlspivey 5y agoUnbound will also pre-fetch your most common lookups prior to the TTL expiring so it's probably even faster than querying a third-party resolver
- egamirorrim 5y agoI don't know if it's an obvious question or not, but how does performance compare with your own unbound vs quad1/8/9? I imagine it's slower in general?
- nfriedly 5y agoI'm not personally running unbound, just a Pi-hole that up-stream's to my ISP's DNS, so I can't answer you from first-hand experience. But, according to drexlspivey, unbound will pre-fetch common queries, so it probably ends up being faster on average - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30646020 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30646020
- lapinot 5y agoI never measured anything, but i'm running a recursive resolver on my laptop since a couple years (knot resolver) and never had any performance problem.
- justsomehnguy 5y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30649709 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30649709
- khimaros 5y agofor anyone running OpenWRT, unbound + adblock works well and is trivially configurable via the LUCI web interface.
- mekster 5y agoI'm using Adguard Home and it's working great. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome
- stingraycharles 5y agoOr you can just run unbound directly. I’ve been doing that for years, and let it directly resolve with the root DNS servers. Can’t get more neutral than that, I’d argue.