> Israel is in a constant state of war and danger of losing its sovereignty. No such justification existed in South African Apartheid. That's not historically

> Israel is in a constant state of war and danger of losing its sovereignty. No such justification existed in South African Apartheid. That's not historically correct. Violence was absolutely a stated reason / pretense of South African apartheid, especially violence between different Black tribes. I'm not sure if that should be considered "war" or not, but it's as much war as what presently goes on between Israelis and Palestinians.