8 ms·
>> The vast majority of people can't tell the difference between a 44.1Khz/16 bits .wav and a 128kbps MP3. ...are you kidding? I think most people could easily
by lostgame 5y ago
>> The vast majority of people can't tell the difference between a 44.1Khz/16 bits .wav and a 128kbps MP3.
...are you kidding? I think most people could easily tell the difference between a CD and a 128kbps MP3 if asked to listen to it hard enough. That, or play it in a club loud enough - and watch everyone cringe.
As the other commenter said - 320kbps - alright, sure. But 128kbps? Come on.
- zbuf 5y agoWith a modern encoder, I think that's virtually guaranteed, yes. Most peoples idea of "horrible" 128kbps seems to be skewed by the early days of MP3 -- which does mean there are horrible files and encoders out there, yes. But a modern LAME encoder is streets ahead at 128kbps.