Thanks for your reasonable reply. I get that Israel's military actions and discriminatory policies are motivated from a sense of insecurity. And I certainly ag

Thanks for your reasonable reply. I get that Israel's military actions and discriminatory policies are motivated from a sense of insecurity. And I certainly agree that the stomach-churning horror of the holocaust is crucial historical context. > they do say at the top of the article it's a "Non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism," Nevertheless, it has been broadly recognised by many organisations and political groups. The IHRA website lists[1] adoption by various governments including, for example, by executive order of the US President[2]. Despite the historical context, as a secularist and anti-racist I think that explicitly trying to maintain a "Jewish state" in opposition to local demographic trends probably is a racist endeavor. At the very least I think there's a reasonable argument to be made, and to people brand who think so as antisemites is pretty chilling. But it doesn't sound like you disagree. [1] https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definitions-charters/working-definition-antisemitism/adoption-endorsement https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-defin... [2] https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/16/2019-27217/combating-anti-semitism https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/16/2019-27...