3 ms·
Yeah, I probably worded that wrong. And that degradation is why we were digitizing them. We wanted the best quality we could get with what we had. The movies we
by clsec 5y ago
Yeah, I probably worded that wrong. And that degradation is why we were digitizing them. We wanted the best quality we could get with what we had. The movies we were working on were out of print and would never be released again in any form.
- jonhohle 5y agoIs that depredation measurable in any way? Not DVD or LaserDisc quality, but much better than I remembered. I’ve put on some tapes that I was actually surprised they looked as good as they did (on a much nicer Trinitron CRT than I ever had when the tapes were new).
- clsec 5y ago>Is that depredation measurable in any way? Not that I know of. It's just an observation that our group of about 15 people agreed on. These were movies that were used a lot (pr0n) and were visibly getting worse (banding, tracking, wear, etc.), not just sitting on a shelf. We would also share them with each other through the mail and use the GoVideo dubbing decks that we all had to make copies. This was for alt.binaries.movies.erotica and associated newsgroups. Probably TMI :)