2 ms·
Makes sense for Chrome's behaviour, but that means Firefox is ignoring the "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff" header, which it supposedly respects: https://blog.
by mkl 5y ago
Makes sense for Chrome's behaviour, but that means Firefox is ignoring the "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff" header, which it supposedly respects: https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2020/04/07/firefox-75-will-respect-nosniff-for-page-loads/ https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2020/04/07/firefox-75-will...
Also, upon further investigation, I think both browsers are displaying the AVIF for me. It has quite a bit less detail than the JPEG, so it's identifiable.
- dchest 5y agoRight, nosniff doesn't apply to images.