4 ms·
> promoted by HN users Other than this article, I can't find any evidence the community has ever discussed it. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&query=rag
by tomnipotent 5y ago
> promoted by HN users
Other than this article, I can't find any evidence the community has ever discussed it.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&query=ragingbull.com&sort=byPopularity&type=all https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&query=ragingbull.com&s...
- maxbond 5y agoHere's at least one time it was discussed that doesn't show up in that search (which I would think it ought to): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25916905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25916905 It doesn't match the description either, but I can't/haven't ruled out there are others. But I would agree that this doesn't appear to be regularly discussed on HN, and I'd speculate this bug/imperfect performance from Algolia is due to this term being rare in the corpus of HN comments.
- tomnipotent 5y agoThis shows up in the search as the second result (this post and that comment are the extent of it). > doesn't appear to be regularly discussed on HN It's literally never been discussed until today. > speculate this bug/imperfect performance That's just misdirection. This very topic is currently visible in results hours after being posted.
- atdrummond 5y agoI will see if I can find an archived comments page containing the reference because I'm extremely confident there was at the very least one extensive comment chain discussing it - I know a couple of discussion threads on the broader topic of individual investing in general got nuked due to obvious promotional spam/other flamebait topics. I know it was brought up on a discussion regarding robo-advisors in the last few months; I'll dig more aggressively and see what I can pull up.