5 ms·
The magnitude of the carbon footprint alone is not enough to hit the threshold? How about the obvious breeding ground for scams, and the tacit approval by the
by uoaei 5y ago
The magnitude of the carbon footprint alone is not enough to hit the threshold?
How about the obvious breeding ground for scams, and the tacit approval by the community because all that money (assets) flows to the top?
There are more reasons, too.
Just because you don't understand someone's argument doesn't mean you should trivialize it.
- eloff 5y agoEvil is not an argument. It is a trivialization itself. One can argue that it's a bad thing (evil is still too strong a word I think.) But that's not what's going on here.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- zarzavat 5y agoOn the carbon footprint: Ethereum will adopt proof of stake soon, of course you can trade NFTs on other chains but at least there’s an effort to drop the carbon footprint to very low levels. That’s more than you can say about most economic activities that have a large carbon footprint. The scams seems like a very weak reason. The internet is full of scams, is the internet evil?
- randomswede 5y agoEthereum has had "proof of stake" as a goal for multiple years, with no obvious evidence that it is any closer to implemented today than it was 3 years ago. I will believe Ethereum to be proof of stake when I see it.
- mcdee 5y agoThe "kiln" testnet is currently running and will carry out the merge in the next few days, which is the final step before the existing proof of work testnets transitioned to proof of stake and then the Ethereum mainnet itself. I think that counts as "obvious evidence".
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- T0Bi 5y ago> with no obvious evidence that it is any closer to implemented today than it was 3 years ago. Apart from a working PoS beacon chain, several multi client dev nets and the last merge testnet before the real merge (barring major bugs) currently running