Shouldn't kettle logic be considered a paradox of Logic? Those options are mutually exclusive only if there are no hidden variables. We could make them theories

Shouldn't kettle logic be considered a paradox of Logic? Those options are mutually exclusive only if there are no hidden variables. We could make them theories and assign probabilities: There is X probability the client was nowhere near the scene of the murder, and Y probability he didn't mean to pull the trigger That way these are not exclusive and the contradiction disappears. Now suppose the client is convicted because X is too high, years later a hidden variable is revealed that reduces the probability to zero. He is released from jail, but another hidden variable appears that increases Y to 100%. There should also be a probability for unknown unknowns, when a fair coin falls sideways.