4 ms·
You mean like using the tool to systematically identify the small changes in suicide likelihood due to parameter variation of a subject's interactions/environme
by wnkrshm 5y ago
You mean like using the tool to systematically identify the small changes in suicide likelihood due to parameter variation of a subject's interactions/environment and then maximizing the likelihood? A suicide inductor.
- cf141q5325 5y agoFor example. Or more likely just not just searching for suicide indicators >but, rather, on aggregating preconscious brain signals to determine what someone believes to be true. The screening process envisioned could involve presenting various statement stimuli of behavioral health relevance, such as biographical information, actions, or intentions (e.g., I want to end my life/enjoy my life) to measure preconscious responses. NEAT would triangulate responses to aggregate evidence and determine if the person reading the stimuli statements believes they are true, false, or indeterminate. Wanna bet that it will very quickly be used for detecting other things the governments deems "unwell". Resulting in another kind of "help". The Simpsons clip sprang to mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0-mofj9EY&t=3s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0-mofj9EY&t=3s It is yet another targeting algorithm that has suicide prevent as one very easily replaceable scenario.