3 ms·
You're just picking from different trade-offs, not doing something better nor worse (nor right nor wrong). A major use-case of RSS readers is to have a local,
by hombre_fatal 5y ago
You're just picking from different trade-offs, not doing something better nor worse (nor right nor wrong).
A major use-case of RSS readers is to have a local, eternal copy of a producer's content to read at your own leisure. I have content in my RSS reader that I cherish from blogs that aren't even online anymore. That I don't need to visit poorly designed websites is only a tertiary perk—I don't need to visit the origin, ever.
There's not much to argue here, though. It's just a different offering. For example, I use https://sumi.news/ https://sumi.news/ (created by some HNer) and certainly don't use it read the entire history of every news website. Nothing wrong with that.
- derekzhouzhen 5y ago> You're just picking from different trade-offs Of course. I am not feedly and I can't afford to keep everything for all the feeds ever subscribed by my users in my database. There are feeds that keep thousands of items and there are feeds that have broken date fields so I cannot prune by date reliably.