4 ms·
For Emacs users, Plain ol' GNU Emacs[1] is almost as tickbox compliant as Aquamacs, and has the benefits of not breaking a whole lot of existing stuff by trying
by shabble 15y ago
For Emacs users, Plain ol' GNU Emacs[1] is almost as tickbox compliant as Aquamacs, and has the benefits of not breaking a whole lot of existing stuff by trying to retrofit it with a 'Mac OSX User Experience'.
If you're familiar with standard emacs settings[2] (and have the appropriate vitriol for those who falter into cua-mode), then http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AquamacsFAQ http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AquamacsFAQ might be of use.
[1] Fairly recent binary builds are maintained at http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/
[2] or, more probably, a config built over several years of slow accretion.
- magoghm 15y agoI use Aquamacs with Unity to develop games. Opening a script file into an Aquamacs buffer by just clicking on it in Unity is very useful to me.
- shabble 15y agoThat should be fairly achievable with either-macs. I started out with Aquamacs, but ended up getting annoyed with enough of the differences that I finally switched back to the (then Carbon, now Cocoa) emacs. Most of the useful settings live in the ns- customize-variable land. ; open all new files in existing frame (setq ns-pop-up-frames nil) ; make Cmd act as meta. (setq ns-command-modifier 'meta) ; ... C-h v ns- TAB TAB