5 ms·

but what are the alternatives?

• pphysch 5y ago
  The selling point of DDG is "pro privacy" i.e. non-interference with its users, now that this is shown to be BS, there is no reason to use it. Might as well use Google/Bing for bigger features... But probably something better out there.
  • mywittyname 5y ago
    Their claim is literally: > We don’t store your personal information. Ever. > Our privacy policy is simple: we don’t collect or share any of your personal information. They are absolutely maintaining their promise. There's no evidence on their site that they have a promise of "non-interference of [our] users". Whatever that means. I read through a lot of articles on spreadprivacy.com looking for evidence to back up your claim, and came up with nothing.
    • prvc 5y ago
      >we don’t collect or share any of your personal information Their lawyers must have a very specific definition of "share" in mind, since they are definitely exposing that information via how their ad system functions.
• CyanBird 5y ago
  Kagi They are in beta right now, If memory serves they will charge around 200usd/year I will be happy paying that to avoid all that other free search engine bullshit, such as this perfect example of ddg destroying their own ethos for.... I am not even sure what they are getting in return for this
  • jcadam 5y ago
    ESG points. Prepping for an exit?