2 ms·
He said, if it were 12000 years old, that would be a massive clue for the Hancock's theories. Well… it's a little bit older. Not what they hoped for.
by paulrouget 5y ago
He said, if it were 12000 years old, that would be a massive clue for the Hancock's theories. Well… it's a little bit older. Not what they hoped for.
- platz 5y agoHancock's an idiot but Randall at least seems to be nominally based in science.
- optimalsolver 5y ago>researchers say it occurred 58 million years ago Only by a bit.