4 ms·

No.

jesterson 5y ago
That was predictable as well :) It was nice having a civilised discussion refuting your unsubstantiated claims :) Now you can find more gullible people to spread the narratives.
- EB-Barrington 5y ago
  For posterity: Lavrov himself today confirmed that the Russians bombed a maternity hospital. Complete, 100% confirmation. He did not deny in any way - he only offered reasons as to "why" this civilian maternity hospital was targeted and destroyed by the Russian invaders. If the Russians and the Ukrainians both agree that the Russians bombed this hospital, video evidence exists, eye witnesses exist ...and you still call it "unsubstantiated", then clearly you're trying to spread disinformation. Perhaps you're not aware, Russia is seriously losing the disinformation/propaganda war, but you can try I guess. Please, refute that single example. To make it simpler: did the Russians bomb a maternity hospital (civilian infrastructure) in Ukraine? There are two answers: "yes" Or, "yes, but.... <insert Russian excuse here>" Guessing you will take the second answer. Would love to chat more, but the air raid siren just sounded.
  - jesterson 5y ago
    Wow, it's pathetic to edit your own posts afterwards. You do it to look nice and conceal you lies or there are other reasons? What you are doing is again, a typical manipulation. If you are doing it because of lack of logic, please have a read about logic. Now back to your question. I'm not acquainted with topic, but if Lavrov said russian forces bombed some hospital, then russian forces bombed some hospital. Does it mean that russian forces destroy civilian infrastructure? No it doesnt. Does it mean they destroy the particular hospital? Yes it is. And to go back to your lies - I call you out on unsubstantiated claims on different matters, which you have no proof whatsoever.
    - EB-Barrington 5y ago
      "If Lavrov said russian forces bombed some hospital, then russian forces bombed some hospital." Finally, you admit it. "Does it mean that russian forces destroy civilian infrastructure? No it doesnt." Oh hang on, you're doing the Russian dance again... Let's see where we are at: Russians - by your admission, by Lavrov's admission, my admission, and Ukraine's admission, are bombing civilian infrastructure. Including, a maternity hospital. Is there really anything more you wish to discuss? I only ever mentioned two matters: 1) the number of times Russia publicly stated they would not invade Ukraine, leading up to the invasion - proven lie. This is a lie. 2) Russians stating this is a "special military operation" against military targets, when their actions explicitly target civilians and civilian infrastructure. Proven lie. This is also a lie. There are no other claims I am making in this thread. Russian govt cannot be trusted = case closed. "I'm not aquainted with that topic" - quelle surprise.

No.

That was predictable as well :) It was nice having a civilised discussion refuting your unsubstantiated claims :) Now you can find more gullible people to spread the narratives.

EB-Barrington 5y ago
For posterity: Lavrov himself today confirmed that the Russians bombed a maternity hospital. Complete, 100% confirmation. He did not deny in any way - he only offered reasons as to "why" this civilian maternity hospital was targeted and destroyed by the Russian invaders. If the Russians and the Ukrainians both agree that the Russians bombed this hospital, video evidence exists, eye witnesses exist ...and you still call it "unsubstantiated", then clearly you're trying to spread disinformation. Perhaps you're not aware, Russia is seriously losing the disinformation/propaganda war, but you can try I guess. Please, refute that single example. To make it simpler: did the Russians bomb a maternity hospital (civilian infrastructure) in Ukraine? There are two answers: "yes" Or, "yes, but.... <insert Russian excuse here>" Guessing you will take the second answer. Would love to chat more, but the air raid siren just sounded.
- jesterson 5y ago
  Wow, it's pathetic to edit your own posts afterwards. You do it to look nice and conceal you lies or there are other reasons? What you are doing is again, a typical manipulation. If you are doing it because of lack of logic, please have a read about logic. Now back to your question. I'm not acquainted with topic, but if Lavrov said russian forces bombed some hospital, then russian forces bombed some hospital. Does it mean that russian forces destroy civilian infrastructure? No it doesnt. Does it mean they destroy the particular hospital? Yes it is. And to go back to your lies - I call you out on unsubstantiated claims on different matters, which you have no proof whatsoever.
  - EB-Barrington 5y ago
    "If Lavrov said russian forces bombed some hospital, then russian forces bombed some hospital." Finally, you admit it. "Does it mean that russian forces destroy civilian infrastructure? No it doesnt." Oh hang on, you're doing the Russian dance again... Let's see where we are at: Russians - by your admission, by Lavrov's admission, my admission, and Ukraine's admission, are bombing civilian infrastructure. Including, a maternity hospital. Is there really anything more you wish to discuss? I only ever mentioned two matters: 1) the number of times Russia publicly stated they would not invade Ukraine, leading up to the invasion - proven lie. This is a lie. 2) Russians stating this is a "special military operation" against military targets, when their actions explicitly target civilians and civilian infrastructure. Proven lie. This is also a lie. There are no other claims I am making in this thread. Russian govt cannot be trusted = case closed. "I'm not aquainted with that topic" - quelle surprise.