3 ms·
I think it’s mostly a matter of cost. USB-C Is more expensive to implement. More signals, more expensive chips. Remember a couple of years ago all those USB-C c
by sircastor 5y ago
I think it’s mostly a matter of cost. USB-C Is more expensive to implement. More signals, more expensive chips. Remember a couple of years ago all those USB-C cables that were damaging hardware?
On top of that (and I’m not familiar with the handshaking or anything) USB-C is both USB-3/4 and Thunderbolt. The latter is daisy-chained whole the former is one-to-many. I wonder if that’s added complexity.