3 ms·
Reminds me of one of my personal heros, Bruce Ames[1] who invented the Ames test, a relatively cheap biological assay that tests for mutagenicity[2]. Essential
by riversflow 5y ago
Reminds me of one of my personal heros, Bruce Ames[1] who invented the Ames test, a relatively cheap biological assay that tests for mutagenicity[2].
Essentially it turns out that tons and tons of stuff, both synthetic and natural is mutagenic to some degree, but we tend to think about it as a binary instead of a spectrum. His argument was that some things that are technically mutagenic, like pesticides and fire retardants have a net benefit in spite of this(e.g. pesticides make a better diet more financially attainable which has a bigger impact on public health than a very small increase in the base rate of cancer), but we lump them all together. It's why California's Prop 65 is just completely stupid; we lump fairly benign things like coffee and wine in with things like asbestos.
The quote I always think of is, "if you have thousands of hypothetical risks that you are supposed to pay attention to, that completely drives out the major risks you should be aware of."
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Ames https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Ames
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_test https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_test
- hedora 5y agoFire retardants are a net negative for public safety. Consumer protection groups, furniture manufacturers, and fire fighters all banded together to eliminate California's requirements for them. It still took over a decade. During that time, the fire retardant manufacturers were literally the only group that supported using them.
- iab 5y agoThat’s some interesting stuff, thanks