The idea of an implicit dialogical contract is common to the ideas of Alfred Jules Ayer, Jurgen Habermas and Carl Rogers in addition to these "Erotetic" philoso

The idea of an implicit dialogical contract is common to the ideas of Alfred Jules Ayer, Jurgen Habermas and Carl Rogers in addition to these "Erotetic" philosophers. An implicit question rides along with a speech act. Even ones like submitting post to HN. In this case it is: "Oh how interesting is Erotetics.. what might this imply for digital technologies of social or commercial value?" And the response might be: "Oh yes, I see there's an overlap with formal query languages (indeed structured ones (SQL)), so maybe we can learn to make better databases" OR "Hmm isn't it interesting that in machine learning the trainer knows both the question and the answer so; is the weight matrix essentially the proof that links the a-priori to the consequent? What can this tell us about building better neural nets" And still, these questions carry along with them implied questions of their own, perhaps to do with the study of language as branch of computing. Each participant "signs" (like a block-chain) their contribution not just with a response, but with an implicit expectation. Wouldn't it be a "fun" (and strange) world, if like that scene in Mr. Robot where everyone at the Allsafe office wears a label that sums up their life, if each comment also had a "Why I am saying this and what I expect in response" field.