8 ms·

Don't you know? Dynamic linking is always better for security. This is a great example. With dynamic linking you can more quickly patch security holes caused by

Don't you know? Dynamic linking is always better for security. This is a great example. With dynamic linking you can more quickly patch security holes caused by dynamic linking.

josephg 5y ago
> Dynamic linking is always better for security Always seems a bit strong given Debian’s policy of dynamic linking is responsible for this security vulnerability.
- arpa 5y ago
- forty 5y ago
  You missed the second part of the message that makes it clear it's sarcasm :)