4 ms·
And the thing is, Portland isn't even that dense of a city. As far as urban environments go, it's hardly Blade Runner. Plenty of detached homes with yards, pa
by michaelchisari 15y ago
And the thing is, Portland isn't even that dense of a city. As far as urban environments go, it's hardly Blade Runner. Plenty of detached homes with yards, parks, etc.
The idea that people have that we have to live like sardines in some anime-inspired megalopolis is simply inaccurate.
If everyone lived in cities as dense as portland, the current human population would only be living on about 2.7% of the world's land mass. Obviously, in terms of resources, it's more complicated than that, but it's clear that sprawling out is terrible for the environment, and that for true nature-lovers, it's much more advantageous to live in a city that has no suburbs, where the world of people truly ends at the city limits.
- cpeterso 15y ago> If everyone lived in cities as dense as portland, the current human population would only be living on about 2.7% of the world's land mass. What is the human population's current footprint? Wikipedia says humans' average population density worldwide (excluding Antarctica and oceans) is about 50 people/km^2.
- michaelchisari 15y agoIf we're averaging 50 people/km^2, that puts our footprint at around 91.6%